At crossbowmans range, determining the sex of a person wearing brightly colored silks, lace, a wig, and with their face painted is impossible. Brightly colored silks, lace, wigs, and makeup were once signs of wealth. Wealthy men (read noblemen) were common targets for crossbowmen, and so to protect themselves they took measures that were blatantly sexist and arrogant, such as requiring women to pass through doorways (a crossbowmans favorite place to take out a target) first. If a crossbowman was out there, they fired at the first thing in brightly colored silk, lace, a wig, and makeup to come through the door. That was the, (as far as the nobleman was concerned) inferior and easily replaceable, noblewoman.
The nobility, particularly those of highest rank, had to constantly fear not only assassination, but other forms of plotting as well. To be whispering at court was a guaranteed way to cause others to believe you were plotting against someone, and if someone thought it was them, it was also a good way to get yourself assassinated in a ‘pre-emtive strike.’ So whispering at court, or anywhere else that one was among other nobles, just wasn’t done.
And if one actually was plotting against someone, to play your hand too openly with potential conspirators was another good way to get yourself killed, though in this case by execution if the potential ally turned out to already be allied to the one you’re conspiring against. So to prevent that, it became common practice to speak ‘around’ things rather than to state them directly, after all, if you said to someone that “Lord Hianmitey rides rather boldly for someone with so little equestrian skill” you faced no fear of reprisals from Lord Hianmitey for trying to assassinate him in what would to the observer appear to be a riding accident.
Why do I mention these things?
“Proper social etiquette says:
a man should ‘allow’ a woman to pass through a door before him.
one should not whisper in the company of others.
it is impolite to speak directly, instead one should hint at what you desire when speaking.
So how did such arrogant and paranoid practices become ‘proper social etiquette?’
Main Entry: ig·no·rance
: the state or fact of being ignorant : lack of knowledge, education, or awareness
Main Entry: ig·no·rant
1 a : destitute of knowledge or education ; also : lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified
There’s your answer, Ignorance. But whos ignorance? The commoners.
The commoner saw the nobility acting in certain ways, and out of simple ignorance of the reality of life at court, assumed the nobility was acting ‘properly.’ So the rules of social etiquette were written, not by the nobility, the social elite, but by the commoner, the average joe clearing the table and carrying in the wood. If one were to take the time to research the rules of “proper social etiquette” one would find that the vast overwhelming majority of those rules came about the same way.
So we have the Arrogant following the rules of the Ignorant, and demonstrating that they too are as Ignorant as those who wrote the rules to begin with.